{"id":2051,"date":"2023-12-07T05:48:39","date_gmt":"2023-12-07T05:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brabus.themeshop.co\/decluttering-a-landing-page-for-better-copy\/"},"modified":"2023-12-08T08:08:08","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T08:08:08","slug":"kvkk-kurulu-tarafindan-paylasilan-en-guncel-kararlar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/?p=2051","title":{"rendered":"K.V.K. Kurulu Taraf\u0131ndan Payla\u015f\u0131lan En G\u00fcncel Kararlar"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

Ki\u015fisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu Taraf\u0131ndan Payla\u015f\u0131lan En G\u00fcncel Kararlar<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
24 Nisan ve 21 Haziran 2023 tarihlerinde Ki\u015fisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu (\u201cKurul<\/strong>\u201d), 6698 say\u0131l\u0131 Ki\u015fisel Verilerin Korunmas\u0131 Kanunu (‘‘Kanun”<\/strong>) kapsam\u0131nda alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00e7e\u015fitli kararlar\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131nlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yay\u0131nlanan kararlarda; veri aktar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7la ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olma ilkesinin alt\u0131 \u00f6nemle \u00e7izilirken, veri sahibinin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n veri sorumlusu taraf\u0131ndan verilerinin payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, veri sahibi taraf\u0131ndan alenile\u015ftirilen verinin amac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, verilerin yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 durumlar\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekilmektedir. Bu hususlarla alakal\u0131 kararlardan baz\u0131lar\u0131na a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sorumlusu, ki\u015fisel verilerinin kargo firmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7apraz barkodlama hatas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131na sebep olmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 05\/01\/2023 tarihli ve 2023\/4 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131<\/strong>:<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde; e-ticaret firmas\u0131ndan sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn kargo firmas\u0131n\u0131n taraf\u0131na teslim etti\u011fi ancak Veri Sahibi ile isim benzerli\u011fi bulunan ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiye ait adres ve ileti\u015fim bilgilerinin kargo paketinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve sipari\u015fin taraf\u0131na ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fark etti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Veri Sorumlusu kargo firmas\u0131na Kanun kapsam\u0131nda, kendisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ait ki\u015fisel verilerin hangi hukuki gerek\u00e7eyle taraf\u0131na g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, benzer \u015fekilde kendisine ait ki\u015fisel verilerin de \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere aktar\u0131l\u0131p aktar\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aktar\u0131ld\u0131ysa hangi hukuki nedenlere dayan\u0131larak aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgi talep etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Veri Sorumlusu, bu durumun barkodlama hatas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u0130lgili Ki\u015fiye ait sipari\u015fin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiden iade al\u0131n\u0131p g\u00f6nderici firmaya teslim edildi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fbu hususta, \u00e7apraz kargo g\u00f6nderimi hatas\u0131 nedeniyle \u0130lgili Ki\u015fiye teslim edilmesi gereken sipari\u015fin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi ve bu suretle \u0130lgili Ki\u015fiye ait ki\u015fisel verilerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi ile payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve Veri Sahibi bu durumun Kanun\u2019un \u201cKi\u015fisel Verilerin Aktar\u0131m\u0131\u201d olan 8. Maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/h6>\r\n
Yap\u0131lan incelemeler sonucu; ya\u015fanan bu hadise de Veri Sahibinin kargo paketi \u00fczerinde yer alan bilgilerinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ula\u015fmas\u0131 bir veri i\u015fleme faaliyeti oldu\u011fu ve bu faaliyetin hukuka uygunlu\u011fu i\u00e7in gereken a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za mevcut olmay\u0131p Kanun\u2019da yer alan bir i\u015fleme \u015fart\u0131na dayanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili hadisenin Kanun\u2019da belirtilen vergi g\u00fcvenli\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ve veri sorumlusunun Kurul\u2019a veri ihlali bildiriminde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle Kurul, Kanun\u2019un 12 maddesi uyar\u0131nca Veri Sorumlusu olan kargo firmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 75.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ki\u015fisel verilerinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 adli yaz\u0131\u015fma bilgilerinin, Veri Sorumlusu eski i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan karde\u015fi ile payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131\u00a0<\/strong>hakk\u0131nda 02\/09\/2022 tarihli ve 2022\/896 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar \u00d6zeti:<\/strong><\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde; Veri Sorumlusu \u015firket ile i\u015f akdinin feshine kadar devam eden \u00f6nceki s\u00fcrede kimlik,<\/strong>\u00a0ileti\u015fim, \u00f6zl\u00fck, mesleki deneyim, sa\u011fl\u0131k verileri gibi ki\u015fisel verilerin i\u015flendi\u011fi, ancak bu ki\u015fisel veri i\u015fleme faaliyetleri ile ilgili ayd\u0131nlatma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 zamanda Veri Sahibi, baz\u0131 ki\u015fisel verilerin i\u015flenmesi hakk\u0131nda kendisinden a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve en \u00f6nemlisi, i\u015f akdiyle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Veri Sahibinin ki\u015fisel verilerini i\u00e7eren ceza soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda yer alan baz\u0131 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n Veri Sorumlusunun karde\u015fine iletildi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir. Hadise ile alakal\u0131 Veri Sorumlusuna ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmasa bile \u0130lgili Ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f al\u0131namam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/h6>\r\n
Kurula yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesi sonucunda; Veri Sahibine ait kimlik bilgilerin Kanun\u2019un 5. Maddesi 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u201cKanunlarda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclme\u201d \u015fart\u0131na dayanarak i\u015flenebilece\u011fi, ancak i\u015f ili\u015fkisiyle alakas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ceza soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda yer alan savc\u0131l\u0131k dilek\u00e7esinin e-posta yoluyla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi olan i\u015fverenin karde\u015fiyle payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle Veri Sorumlusu\u2019na 150.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na Kurul taraf\u0131ndan karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ameliyat s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7ekilen foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n veri sorumlusu hastanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir doktorun sosyal medya hesab\u0131nda payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 29\/06\/2022 tarihli ve 2022\/630 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar \u00d6zeti:<\/strong><\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibi \u015fikayetinde \u00f6zetle; Veri Sahibi burun ameliyat\u0131 oldu\u011fu hastanede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan doktorun Ki\u015fi bayg\u0131n oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada foto\u011fraflar\u0131na \u00e7ekti\u011fi, Ki\u015finin ki\u015fisel verilerinin reklam ve pazarlama amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde doktorun iki y\u0131l boyunca kendi sosyal medya hesab\u0131nda foto\u011fraflar\u0131 tuttu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Veri sorumlusu; ilgili foto\u011fraflarda burun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda belirleyici bir unsurun olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle foto\u011fraflar\u0131n \u0130lgili Ki\u015fiyle ili\u015fkilendirilemeyece\u011fi ve ayr\u0131ca Ki\u015finin uygulanan tedavinin \u00f6zellikleri, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda kamunun bilgilendirilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za verdi\u011fini ancak a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za geri al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra \u015fikayete konu foto\u011fraflar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
\u0130lgili hadisede Kurul; ilgili foto\u011fraflarda ki\u015finin y\u00fcz hatlar\u0131n\u0131 belirten ka\u015f, b\u0131y\u0131k gibi unsurlar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle Veri Sahibinin kimli\u011finin belirlenebilir oldu\u011funu ve en \u00f6nemlisi \u0130lgili Ki\u015finin verdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zan\u0131n hastaneye ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu bu sebeple doktorun ki\u015fisel sosyal medya da foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 belirli bir konuya ili\u015fkin, bilgilendirmeye dayal\u0131 ilkesi uyar\u0131nca verilen a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zan\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kurul; doktor hakk\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda yarg\u0131lanabilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015f, hastane hakk\u0131nda ise 100.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin internet arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ula\u015f\u0131lan i\u015fyeri e-postas\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n veri sorumlusu bir pazarlama \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan ticar\u00ee elektronik ileti g\u00f6nderilmesini konu alan 01\/09\/2022 tarihli ve 2022\/861 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar \u00d6zeti:<\/strong><\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ilgili dilek\u00e7esinde; Veri Sorumlusu \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan Veri Sahibinin e-posta adresine reklam, kampanya vb. ama\u00e7larla ticari elektronik ileti g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi belirtmi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili Ki\u015fi, Veri Sorumlusunun e-posta adresine \u00a0reklam veya kampanya i\u00e7erikli e-postalar\u0131n g\u00f6nderilmemesi ve ki\u015fisel verilerinin imha edilmesi taleplerini belirten mail g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. \u015eirket, sadece imha i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir ve bunun \u00fczerine \u0130lgili Ki\u015fi Kurul\u2019a ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/h6>\r\n
Kurul\u2019un incelemesi sonucu; Veri Sahibinin ki\u015fisel verilerini reklam ve kampanya amac\u0131yla alenile\u015ftirmedi\u011fini zira alenile\u015ftirilen ki\u015fisel verilerin de alenile\u015ftirme amac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda i\u015flenmesinin Kanun\u2019a ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ilgili olay\u0131n Kanun\u2019un 5. Maddesinde belirtilen veri i\u015fleme \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle ilgili \u015firketin veri i\u015fleme faaliyeti nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda 150.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin ki\u015fisel verilerinin teknoloji \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 17\/03\/2022 tarihli ve 2022\/249 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar \u00d6zeti:<\/strong><\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinde; \u00fcye oldu\u011fu internet sitesinde herhangi bir \u00e7erez politikas\u0131n\u0131n yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ayd\u0131nlatma metni olup bu metinde ki\u015fisel verilerin yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilse bile bu hususta a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine, internet sitesine konuya ili\u015fkin e-posta yoluyla ba\u015fvuruda bulunan Veri Sahibi 30 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde herhangi bir d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle Kurul\u2019a ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Kurul taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan incelemede; ilk olarak Veri Sorumlusu olan internet sitesinin Ba\u015fvuru Usul ve Esaslar\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Tebli\u011f\u2019in 6. maddesinin 1. F\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, Veri Sorumlusunun ilgili ki\u015filerce yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurular\u0131 etkin, hukuka ve d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131na uygun olarak sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmak \u00fczere gerekli idari ve teknik tedbirlerin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00a0Kanun\u2019un \u201cVerilen Yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na Aktar\u0131m\u0131\u201d hakk\u0131nda olan 9. Maddesi kapsam\u0131nda; Veri Sorumlusu \u015firketin Kurul onay\u0131ndan ge\u00e7mi\u015f taahh\u00fctnamesi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle veri sahiplerinden a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131za almas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ancak ilgili olayda a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zan\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple; Ba\u015fvuru Usul ve Esaslar\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Tebli\u011f uyar\u0131nca veri sahipleri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurular\u0131 etkin, hukuka ve d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131na uygun olarak sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmak \u00fczere gerekli idari ve teknik tedbirleri almas\u0131 hususunda Veri Sorumlusunun uyar\u0131lmas\u0131na ve ki\u015fisel verilerin yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na aktar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finden bahisle de hakk\u0131nda 950.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibinin, i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisi ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmenin i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki bilgilerin i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yap\u0131lan \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan hali haz\u0131rdaki i\u015fyeri ile payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 04\/08\/2022 tarihli ve 2022\/798 say\u0131l\u0131 Karar \u00d6zeti<\/strong>:<\/h6>\r\n
Veri Sahibi \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinde; Veri Sorumlusu firma ile i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdikten sonra mevcut \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerine ula\u015fan Veri Sorumlusu \u015firket, \u0130lgili Ki\u015finin mevcut \u015firket hakk\u0131nda itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeler nitelikte a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Veri Sahibi, i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Veri Sorumlusu \u015firkete ki\u015fisel verilerinin i\u015flenip i\u015flenmedi\u011fi ve kimlerle payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konular\u0131nda bilgi edinmek, ayr\u0131ca maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n tazmini ile ki\u015fisel verilerinin imha edilmesi hususunda ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f, yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f alamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/h6>\r\n
Kurul yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda; Veri Sahibinin i\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda Veri Sorumlusu \u015firketle payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015fisel verileri Kanun\u2019un \u201cKi\u015fisel Verilerin Aktar\u0131lmas\u0131\u201d hakk\u0131nda olan 8. Maddesi kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda mevcut \u015firketle payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu sebeple, veri aktar\u0131m faaliyetinin Kanun\u2019un ilgili maddesine uygun olmayarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi ve yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisine Veri Sahibi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak Veri Sorumlusu \u015firket hakk\u0131nda 100.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/h6>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ki\u015fisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu Taraf\u0131ndan Payla\u015f\u0131lan En G\u00fcncel Kararlar 24 Nisan ve 21 Haziran 2023 tarihlerinde Ki\u015fisel Verileri Koruma Kurulu (\u201cKurul\u201d), 6698 say\u0131l\u0131 Ki\u015fisel Verilerin Korunmas\u0131 Kanunu (‘‘Kanun”) kapsam\u0131nda alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00e7e\u015fitli kararlar\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131nlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yay\u0131nlanan kararlarda; veri aktar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7la ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olma ilkesinin alt\u0131 \u00f6nemle \u00e7izilirken, veri sahibinin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n veri sorumlusu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2925,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kategori-disi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2051"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2934,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2051\/revisions\/2934"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/isildaklilaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}